Given these 2011 results, I decided to revisit my August 17, 2011 post "Best and Worst Presidents Relative to Debt Growth" http://datainthenews.blogspot.com/2011/08/best-and-worst-presidents-relative-to.html. Now that Obama has 3 years of actuals under his term, I decided to include him with the other presidential terms I had evaluated in the August 17th blog. Using all the same criteria, the results and conclusions did not change, much to my surprise. The summary table of these comparisons follows:
As before, I evaluated each President on the GDP Growth as well as the components of Debt: Receipts (including Individual and Corporate Taxes), Outlays, Deficit, and Supplemental. As for "good" or "bad" evaluations, I am assuming higher Receipts is good and lower Outlays are good which lowers the deficit and the debt. I recognize that certain political philosophies may not support these being "good". I also evaluated Receipts, Outlays and Debt growth relative to GDP growth. In all these categories, I then awarded a point each time a Presidential Term appeared in the highest two or lowest two growth rates in all these different categories.The two Presidential terms with the highest point counts for "Best" were Clinton with 7 and Carter with 6 (Obama had 5). The Terms with the highest point counts for "Worst" are Bush 1 with 6 and Nixon with 5 (Obama had 3).
In spite of the deficits and debt being at record levels during this recession, the Debt Growth leader is still Reagan at 15.1%.
No comments:
Post a Comment